„If the process of drafting the constitution was politically one-sided, so is the document itself: its preamble – the »profession of national faith« – enshrines an ethnic vision of Hungary as a Christian country and rather pathetically evokes historical grandeur. Many Hungarians simply cringe when they read the preamble's trumpeting of Hungarian achievements in the world and the saga of how one small country saved Europe from the Turks. Outsiders, on the other hand, may want to go easy on what appears to be the inferiority complex of a country that has never quite overcome the impact of huge losses of people and territory after the first world war.
But the preamble is not just national martyrology and kitschy symbolism. Its national conservative values, so one constitutional article states, are to inform interpretations of the document as a whole. Many international experts construe further provisions to mean that all the liberal democratic constitutional jurisprudence since 1989 – being still connected to the originally communist constitution – is invalid..
Now, consider two further »innovations«: first, a comprehensive weakening of checks and balances – notably a much enfeebled new constitutional court – and the fact that the new constitution will be virtually impossible to amend, while much legislation, notably budgets, can only be passed with a two-third majorities. Second, the systematic staffing of the judiciary and other nominally independent agencies with Fidesz appointees for exceptionally long periods.
What is the result? Fidesz's nationalist vision has potentially been enshrined forever: even if the party loses future elections, its appointees will keep exercising power, while the party itself will in all likelihood retain considerable influence, since no other political grouping is likely to muster a two-thirds majority. Any potential leftwing government will be highly constrained; its budget could be vetoed by the (Fidesz-staffed) budgetary council, upon which the (Fidesz-appointed) president can dissolve parliament.”