Magánokirat-hamisítás miatt felelhet az ír gázoló

Mondjuk ha okirathamisítás, akkor egy ügyvéd is sáros benne, illene azt is a vádlottak padjára ültetni. Tobin ebbe fog belekapaszkodni: egyedül nem okirathamisíthatott. Viszont ha Navracsicsnak lenne vér a pucájában, akkor menne az ügyvéd is a törvény elé - de hát holló hollónak... m.a.

Most elkapjuk? Nyilván emiatt kiadják, ha már a halálos gázolás miatt nem tették...

ps: Na, ennyit a magyar bíróságról, ügyészekről is!: "Statements made by Tobin after his arrest were ruled to be inadmissible on the basis that they had been translated by his lawyer's daughter." Tobin letartóztatása után tett vallomását elfogadhatalannak ítélték (bíró), arra alapozva azt, hogy azt ügyvédjének lánya fordította!!! Első ügyvédje: Soós Tibor, lánya Soós Káta. Később, jé, a Bárándi Péter vitte az ügyet...Ki gondolta volna? Tobin lakott területen + 70 km/h-val "váltott sávot"... Az igazi kérdés, hogy Tobin kiknek az embere, kik védik, miért hagyták futni. Mert Tobint "elengedték" 2002-ben! (Dávid Ibolya, Lampert M., Petrétei József, Takács Albert, Draskovics, Bárándy,..ismerős a leves?)

Csak a vicc kedvéért, találják ki hogy hívják Tobin ügyvédjét, vagy a bírót, aki szabadlábra tetették, hogy "elmehessen"? "When Tobin was first interviewed by the police they had asked him to present his passport which they retained. In the Autumn of 2000 he requested the return of his passport so that he could visit Ireland for a wedding and to see his family. This request was granted but he was not asked to return his passport on his return on 9 October 2000. On 30 October 2000 Tobin returned Ireland permanently, his period of secondment to Irish Life Hungary having come to an end. Tobin's trial took place in Hungary on 7 May 2002 in Mr. Tobin's absence albeit in the presence of lawyers acting on Tobin's behalf. Statements made by Tobin after his arrest were ruled to be inadmissible on the basis that they had been translated by his lawyer's daughter. His trial took place under section 187 of the Hungarian criminal code which provides that: (1) The person who causes grievous bodily harm to another person or persons by the violation of the rules of public road traffic, by negligence, commits a misdemeanour, and shall be punishable with imprisonment of up to one year, labour in the public interest, or fine. (2) The punishment shall be a) imprisonment of up to three years, if the crime causes durable handicap, serious health injury or mass catastrophe, b) imprisonment between one to five years, if the crime causes death, c) imprisonment from two years to eight years, if the crime causes the death of more than two person or a fatal mass catastrophe. He was convicted and sentenced to three years in prison. On appeal his sentence was amended to allow for the possibility of parole after 18 months."