In the last 20 years, the Socialist Party (MSZP) was the most influential, well-established party in Hungary and among the strongest of the communist successor parties in the region of central and eastern Europe. But in 2010 it suffered a landslide defeat to Viktor Orbán's conservative Fidesz party. The longtime challenger suddenly enjoyed a two-thirds majority in parliament. Cast into the wilderness, former Socialist Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány formed a small new party called Demokratikus Koalíció (Democratic Coalition, or DK). Former Prime Minister Gordon Bajnai, who served in the Gyurcsány Government as minister of development and economy and became head of government when scandal and falling popularity forced Gyurcsány to step aside, returned to Hungarian political and economic life.
While many commentators aligned with the opposition have, since 2010, been fueling expectations of Bajnai’s heroic return to politics, he waited until the end of 2012 to re-engage (see our previous post about Bajnai’s dilemmas here). Együtt 2014 formed in the early autumn of 2012, when the civic movement called Milla, the Szolidaritás trade-union movement, and Bajnai’s Haza és Haladás (or, Homeland And Progress) think tank joined forces. The aim of this well-planned but fragile combination was to gather a number of the most credible opposition political forces and then find some modus for cooperation with the still organized and influential Socialist Party (MSZP), which despite its recent decay remains the biggest of the opposition parties. (See also our post about Milla here.)
It hasn’t worked out so well. The most credible parliamentary party on the liberal Left, LMP (Politics Can Be Different), snubbed Együtt 2014's offer to form a closer cooperation. It was not an easy decision for LMP: half the party was in favor of an alliance, with the other half, including group leader András Schiffer, opposed to it. The debate nearly tore the party apart, but in the end LMP rejected the offer and Schiffer kept his job. Now, LMP seems to be united behind a strategy firmly grounded in its very name and original identity -- that is, a party that emerges from an aging, rotten political system and its declining parties and politicians -- but as the elections come closer, tensions may again ignite.