One is that the initial privatization of the building took place under extremely dubious circumstances under a previous Socialist-led local government. (It was originally sold by the District VI municipality to someone for just HUF 220 million – less than 3% of the price eventually paid by its current owner.) One could easily make an argument that, at least in moral terms, the building is stolen property. Certainly, if Orbán & Co. went around selling historic state buildings for fillers on the forint to well-connected insiders I would expect little sympathy for anyone caught holding the bag following the next change of government.
More crucially, the piece fails to mention that the building has been sitting empty for more than a decade, and that it is routine for governments around the world to seek control of properties seen as contributing to urban blight. At no point did they discuss seizing the building without some form of compensation."